Traditional SEO tracks whether you rank on Google. It doesn't tell you whether ChatGPT, Perplexity, or Gemini actually mention your brand when someone asks a buying question in those tools instead. That's a different, newer problem, and it needs a different kind of tracking, the same approach behind GEOGym, applied to your brand.
I built GEOGym to solve this exact problem, a Python and Streamlit pipeline that queries multiple LLMs with real buying-intent prompts and tracks whether a brand shows up in the answer, deployed as a client-facing dashboard rather than a one-off spreadsheet.
The same methodology applies here. Prompts are written around what a real prospect would ask an AI assistant while researching, not just the brand name in isolation, since almost nobody actually types a competitor comparison that plainly. Results get tracked over repeated runs, not a single query, because a single AI answer on any given day tells you very little on its own.
A benchmarking platform built at Concurate to track whether a brand actually gets cited inside ChatGPT, Perplexity, and Gemini answers, using B2B buying prompts against multiple LLMs and reporting export functionality and share-of-voice tracking through a deployed dashboard.
SEO gets you found on Google's results page. GEO, Generative Engine Optimization, is about whether ChatGPT, Perplexity, or Gemini actually mention your brand when someone asks a relevant question inside those tools instead of searching Google. They pull from different signals, structured data and clear entity information matter more, direct traditional backlinks matter less.
ChatGPT, Perplexity, and Gemini primarily, since those are where real assistant-driven buying research is happening right now. Coverage expands as usage shifts, the goal is tracking where your actual prospects are asking, not every tool that exists.
That's a real constraint, and it's why a single query means almost nothing. The same prompt set gets run repeatedly over time, and what matters is the citation frequency and trend across those runs, not any one answer. Treating a single response as gospel is how this kind of tracking goes wrong.